Diary of a Foreign Minister
Bob Carr
Newsouth, 2014
502 pages
Too often, Bob Carrās diary sounds like an episode of Grumpy Old Ministers.
An 18-month stint as foreign minister in the doomed Rudd-Gillard-Rudd federal Labor government, the globe-trotting Carr gripes about the dead prose of his departmental talking points, the lifeless food and draining jetlag of plane travel, the awfulness of hotels, Canberra (āthe City of the Deadā) and contracting viruses from shaking hands all day on the campaign trail āwithout a hand sanitiser in the car ā damn!ā
His Diary of a Foreign Minister often doesnāt reach these paltry heights, however, for we see a failure. Not of intelligence, for Carr is smart and cultured ā literature, opera, Shakespeare ā once you get the gym bore off-topic but rather it is a failure of politics ā the politics of an ALP Right leader and comfortable member of the capitalist foreign policy club.
The powerful are his milieu, the āglittering careeristsā (ānothing wrong with thatā) who head the āinternational architectureā of the UN, G20, IMF, EU, NATO. He is on first name terms with Henry Kissinger (āmy favourite world-historical figureā) and Hillary Clinton (āany time with Hillary is pure champagneā).
He is in his element āspeed-datingā UN diplomats to garner votes for Australiaās bid for a seat on the UN Security Council.
This vote-charming motive is also at play in wooing the Arab bloc when he advocates not isolating Australia in the UN on Arab-Israeli issues.
āWe would blow our support from all those Arab states, and that would cost us the Security Council electionā, he argues forcefully with Gillard, who is receptive to the āIsrael lobbyā ā the Labor-funding, Zionist, Melbourne business interests. He despairs that the Labor government is āsubcontracting our foreign policy to party donorsā.
Although there is an element of genuine conviction in his opposition to an āapartheidā Israeli state expanding its settlements on Palestinian land, such a display of principle is rare. Far more common is Carr defending Australiaās ānational interestsā.
If this means selling Tibet down the river (so as not to antagonise our regionās strongest power and biggest economy), or Sri Lankaās Tamils or Indonesiaās West Papuans (we need their help on refugees), so be it.
āIām running a foreign policy for Australia, not for Human Rights Watch or the Tamil National Allianceā, he declares petulantly.
The nationsā peoples, more generally, donāt get much of a look in, except as victims needing aid, certainly not as political actors.
Nor do dissidents like Julian Assange, for whom Carr has an enmity that is both personal and political. No doubt this is because the information rebel has violated the precious secrecy of the diplomatic cables to which Carr is addicted.
On domestic politics, Carr is uninspiring. If he were prime minister, he would āneutraliseā the business sector ā no mining taxes or āclass warā rhetoric. He would have proudly been a āLiberal in Labor clothingā.
Although he shares the belated insight with Rudd that Murdoch, the heads of Rio-Tinto, BHP and the banks ārun the countryā, the ALP, moribund from top to bottom, that Carr documents will not be the one to do something about it.