
Play On! The Hidden History of Womenās Australian Rules Football
Brunette LenkiÄ and Rob Hess
Echo Publishing 2016,
324 pages
In a landmark development, the first national womenās Australian Football competition ā AFL Womenās ā will be launched next February. But a century ago, attitudes to women playing the game were very different.
Early last century, it was feared that allowing women to play Australian Football would be a slippery slope to giving them the vote and other rights enjoyed by men, say Brunette LenkiÄ (footy fan) and Professor Rob Hess (sport historian) in Play On! The Hidden History of Womenās Australian Rules Football. More than 100 years of Australian women footballersā āresilience in the face of indifference, ridicule, hostility and limited supportā has won women their right to play the game. Womenās football has had a long, but strictly second-class, history.
Early 20th century games were scratch matches, one-off novelty affairs between work-based teams (mostly seamstresses and sales staff from retail stores). These were used as a gimmick by businesses to market their millinery, including athletically-unfriendly skirts, in fundraising matches staged for the war effort or for support for the unemployed during the Great Depression.
Playing footy from womenās sheer love of it was not a consideration and many barriers to regularisation of the womenās game remained. The Vaticanās 1934 outlawing of womenās soccer as āunwomanlyā, enforced in Italy by Mussoliniās fascists, flowed over into official Catholic distaste for women kicking the oval-shaped ball as well as the round ball. Meanwhile Protestant churches, as late as the 1960s, were still denouncing womenās football as a āGodless trendā that violates āthe Christian concept of womanhoodā.
Religion also decreed against sport being played on Sundays, one of the few timeslots available for women to fit regular club-based matches around the male, even junior boysā, football schedule. Access to ovals and other facilities continued to be monopolised by men. The press was also condescending, mocking and trivialising in its coverage of womenās games, only reluctantly acknowledging the womenās competitive spirit, skill and athleticism. Routine sexism dogged the womenās game.
In 1947, one woman player recalled the womenās teams running onto the field to āa chorus of wolf-whistlesā. Revered icons of the menās game, like the legendary, tough captain-coach of Richmond Jack āCaptain Bloodā Dyer said women were physically and mentally unsuited to football. āTheir minds would be bewildered by the rulesā, injuries could ruin their āchance to become mothersā, and the hardening of their muscles would āspoil the shape of their legsā. Women, who had long kept the menās game going through volunteering, rarely had the favour returned by men.
As post-60s feminism challenged all aspects of a male-dominated society, womenās football gradually made progress. Feminism was invoked by the founder of the organised Victorian womenās competition. The sexist headwinds slowly abated, though not without occasional oppositional gusts ā a commercial TV channel filmed one training session of a womenās team in WA in 1988, edited as āa blooper reel set to circus musicā.
Momentum for womenās football has continued to grow, however. A big step came in 2007 when the Australian Football League (AFL) Commission, the gameās governing body, formally got behind it.
The decision was based less on high-minded, abstract egalitarian principle, than on commercial grounds. Compared to some other football codes, Australian Football has always appealed strongly to women. Women account for 45% of current AFL attendees, and 284,000 women and girls now play organised competitive football. As a ābusiness enterpriseā, the AFL has sniffed market potential and revenue from television rights to the womenās game.
A televised Western Bulldogs-Melbourne womenās exhibition game last year rated its boots off. It drew half a million viewers, more than watched a lacklustre Adelaide-Essendon menās game the same weekend. Television networks have caught the heady whiff of advertising dollars. It may have taken crude capitalist calculation to make a go of womenās football, but a formal, financially-viable, eight-team, unionised (200 new members of the AFL Playersā Association face their next frontier ā pay parity) elite national womenās competition, finally becomes reality next year. Up There, Kaz!